My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2008 04 07 Work Session
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2008
>
BC 2008 04 07 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2009 12:07:19 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:03:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
6/18/2008
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 7, 2008 (Work Session) Page 778 <br />mitigation fee for the schools since he thought the infrastructure is there <br />to support this project and asked if the mitigation payment could be waived. <br />John Day, County Manager, asked the County Attorney to respond. <br />Richard Koch, County Attorney, reported there is no provision in the <br />ordinance to waive the application of the fee because it applies to all the <br />properties that are being developed within the County or the municipalities <br />and are governed by state statute and local ordinance. He stated the Board <br />does not have the ability to just waive the fee. He reported there could be <br />some flexibility with how the fee is applied, but the purpose of the <br />ordinance and the fee is to provide some concurrency between the effects of <br />the project being proposed and students generated by that number of units <br />that would need to have a place to go to school in that district. He stated <br />the County has the requirement to provide a place for these students to go to <br />school, but there is not presently capacity to do so. He said the purpose of <br />the ordinance is to try to provide a mechanism for the County to provide the <br />seats that are required when the project would come on line. He further <br />reported the ordinance and fee is being applied to the Mardan X project the <br />same way it is been applied to all other projects. <br />Mark McCormick stated he had received a statement that there is <br />adequate capacity for the project. <br />Susie Morris, Planning and Zoning Manager, stated when the calculations <br />were completed, there was capacity and that the Board has historically <br />requested the voluntary mitigation payment as well. She also responded to <br />questions on how the capacity and the impact of the development at each <br />school level were calculated. <br />Mr. Day clarified that the number "11" as shown on the Reservation of <br />Capacity and Capacity Schedule does not mean that is the available capacity. <br />He said it is the level of capacity that remains after the children <br />associated with the development are accounted for. <br />After responding to questions related to the use of previously approved <br />homes in the calculations, Ms. Morris said the Adequate Public Facilities <br />Ordinance states what must be used to determine current available capacity <br />and planned capacity at the two and five year levels. She said once the <br />current available capacity is determined, any planned capacity for the two- <br />year mark as well as any for the five-year mark is added. With regard to the <br />Mardan X project, she said there is current capacity and planned capacity at <br />two and five year levels. <br />Mr. Day stated this was the first case where there is available <br />capacity. He said the developer has a choice to proceed without reserving <br />capacity and take the risk that when the development opens, there still is <br />capacity available. He explained this process is similar to reserving sewer <br />capacity; if you pay the fee and reserve capacity, no one can take it away <br />from you. However, he said if the fee is not paid and capacity no longer <br />exists when a certificate of occupancy is requested, then there is a problem. <br />Mark McCormick stated he was hoping to get the Reservation of Capacity <br />Certificate approved at building permitting and a brief discussion ensued. <br />Chairman White suggested the Board take a short recess in order for the <br />County Attorney and Ms. Morris to confer. <br />Recess of Meeting <br />The Board took a short recess at 5:13 p.m. Chairman White reconvened <br />the meeting at 5:33 p.m. <br />- Mardan X. LLC <br />Richard Koch, County Attorney reported the calculations shown in the <br />Reservation of Capacity memorandum were done by the formula in the Ordinance. <br />He said the formula includes the existing capacity and committed capacity, <br />which are projects that are already in the pipeline. He explained that on <br />the face of it there is capacity at each level in the schools; however, when <br />you add the student generation rate for this project based on the number of <br />units the project is going to have, there will not be capacity at the <br />elementary school level. He said the student generation rates are multiplied <br />by the number of units and compared to the formulas to determine if there is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.