Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 15, 2006 - Regular Meeting <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />586 <br /> <br />the jail project as planned will have a dramatic negative effect on the <br />character and image of downtown Concord and on the tax burden carried by all <br />Cabarrus County residents. <br /> <br />Alex Porter I resident of 193 South Union Street I stated he represents <br />the \\Citizens for a Better Concord" and the "Residents of Historic Concord" <br />who want a smaller jail downtown. If the large housing units must be built, <br />he said the County should consider a less obvious, much larger and flatter <br />site that would save the County money on screening, facades and site <br />development. He said the only people speaking in favor of the j ail are <br />County staff or groups they control and stated the largest group of <br />stakeholders/homeowners would have supported the project if a more moderate <br />plan had been adopted. <br /> <br />Allison Kitfield of 192 North Union Street in Concord compared the <br />proposed multi-story jail project in Cabarrus County to a less expensive one- <br />story jail facility recently built in Brunswick County. She said the <br />proposed jail site in downtown Concord is limited and steeply sloped which <br />results in greater development costs and a much more expensive multi-story <br />design. Because the jail is an extension of downtown Concord, she said the <br />use of expensive exterior materials is also required. She further commented <br />on the elimination of the second inmate housing unit and stated there is no <br />room for future expansion at the site. MS. Kitfield asked the Board to vote <br />for a less expensive bond financing package and for a scaled down, more <br />practical version of the jail project. <br /> <br />Chelsea King of Firecrest Street in Concord said the County's debt will <br />increase by 45 percent if the jail is built and taxes will have to be <br />increased. She reported there are more than 10,000 citizens living in <br />poverty and more than 17,000 senior citizens in Cabarrus County. She asked <br />if the poor will be able to pay the higher taxes and if the elderly will have <br />to sell their homes. Finally, she asked if there was a cheaper alternative <br />for the jail. <br /> <br />Kathleen Rothwell, resident of Dogwood Street in Concord, reported <br />Cabarrus County spent less than $11 million on each of its last two <br />elementary schools. She stated building the jail in a cheaper location would <br />enable the County to have an adequate new jail plus one or two new schools. <br />She asked what was more important, education for the children or convenience <br />for the downtown lawyers. <br /> <br />Thomas Hopper of Concord stated he received the "Impact through <br />Education" award from cabarrus County ten years ago. He said the County has <br />greatly impacted his education and plans to return to Concord after college. <br />He stated Cabarrus County has a great education system, growth, and a vibrant <br />culture. Mr. Hopper stated he foresees an excessive tax burden on the young <br />people and asked the Board to put the matter in a referendum to the people. <br /> <br />Ben Cohen of 192 North Union Street in Concord reported the <br />will be paid over $50,000.00 to pick out furniture for the jail. <br />this fee is more than twice the average yearly per person income <br />County. Mr. Cohen also said the jail debt will saddle everyone <br />burden that will impact the future of every person that wants <br />Cabarrus County. <br /> <br />Architects <br />He stated <br />in Cabarrus <br />with a tax <br />to live in <br /> <br />Deborah Arbes of 348 Union Street in Concord stated <br />intention to show the size and scale of the jail complex. Using <br />presentation, she presented a virtual three dimensional tour of <br />jail complex and a comparison of the size of the facilities <br />houses. She invited residents to contact UCitizens for a Better <br />additional information regarding the project. <br /> <br />it was her <br />a powerpoint <br />the proposed <br />with nearby <br />Concord" for <br /> <br />Ms. Ellen Sewell of Concord addressed the issue of costs versus the <br />benefits of reconsidering alternate locations for the jail. With the <br />elimination of any future second housing unit at that location, she stated <br />any economies of scale associated with laundry, food preparation and health <br />care were eliminated and site benefits reduced. She questioned the future use <br />of the remainder of the property and suggested the entire parcel could be <br />sold for mixed-use development. Further, she commented on the cost of <br />additional conditions to gain public acceptance and approval from the City of <br />Concord and asked if the site was still the best location for the facility. <br /> <br />Dr. Martha Sommer of 195 North Union Street in Concord addressed the <br />issue of parking in downtown Concord and the impact of the jail on the <br />downtown businesses. She stated there are 360 public parking and 10 <br />handicapped spaces in downtown Concord and a projected 864 inmate visitors <br />