My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BC 2006 12 04 ORG?RECESS
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
BOC
>
2006
>
BC 2006 12 04 ORG?RECESS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2009 1:04:32 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 1:04:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Minutes
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/4/2006
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 4, 2006 (Organizational/Recessed Meeting) Page 189 <br />(E) NOTICE OF PROPQSED DEVELOPMENT FINANCING PLAN - N.C. RESEARCH CAMPUS <br />(DEADLINE 12/5 TO OBJECT) <br />Steve Cordell, the County's Bond Attorney, provided a general overview <br />of the statute on Tax Increment Financing (TI F), including the establishment <br />of a financing district and financing plan proposed by the City of <br />Kannapolis. He reported Kannapolis has to submit a copy of its financing <br />plan to all districts involved, including Rowan County; a copy of the plan <br />was mailed to the County on November 7, 2006; the County has 28 days to <br />respond to the plan, which expires on December 5, 2006. He said if the Board <br />chooses to do nothing, Kannapolis can adopt their plan and proceed with the <br />project. However, he. said if the Board were to vote to reject the plan, then <br />Kannapolis cannot adopt the district or the financing plan and would have to <br />start over. <br />Mr. Cordell responded to several questions concerning: if and how the <br />financing district could be changed after Kannapolis adopts the plan, the <br />district's boundaries and would the Local Government Commission (LGC) approve <br />the financing plan with a challenge to the constitutional amendment filed. <br />Vice Chairman Juba made a MOTION to approve the proposed development <br />financing plan as submitted for the North Carolina Research Campus. <br />Commissioner Mynatt seconded the motion. <br />Mr. Correll advised that no formal action is needed and that the Board <br />can simply take no action. <br />Vice Chairman Juba withdrew the motion and Commissioner Mynatt withdrew <br />the second. <br />(F) DISCUSSION OF PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION OF SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUILDING <br />Chairman Carruth commented on contractually separating the Sheriff's <br />Administration building from the inmate housing unit and constructing the <br />Administration building while awaiting the outcome of the appeal. He said <br />cost estimates for the Administration building could be obtained from Turner <br />Construction by December 18 and that proceeding with the Administration <br />building now would save a significant amount of money. <br />Commissioner Mynatt read a prepared statement concerning the lawsuit, <br />the size of the jail and the benefits of developing the current jail site <br />into a mixed-used development and relocating the housing unit to another <br />location. In her statement, she also recommended that a small committee be <br />formed comprised of one Board of Commissioner, one City Council member, one <br />member of the plaintiffs that filed the lawsuit, the Sheriff, a Board of <br />Director member from the Cabarrus Regional Chamber of Commerce and the <br />Cabarrus Economic Development Corporation, and the appropriate preservation <br />and historic groups in the downtown area. She further recommended Vice <br />Chairman Juba serve as the Board's representative on the proposed committee. <br />Commissioner Privette moved to accept Commissioner Mynatt's <br />recommendation. <br />Commissioner Mynatt seconded the motion. <br />The Board recognized Scott Milligan with Turner Construction and there <br />was discussion on: how much it is costing the County to not build the jail <br />facility, changes tothe Annex that may be needed if the housing unit is <br />moved to another location, potential savings that could be gained by not <br />having to spend money on appearance related issues if the housing unit was <br />moved to another location, the concept of downtown Concord continuing to <br />serve as the County seat or strictly becoming a historic residential <br />community, etc. <br />Chairman Carruth asked Vice Chairman Juba to serve on the proposed <br />committee. <br />Vice Chairman Juba stated she has concerns and asked for some time to <br />think about it. <br />There was a brief discussion on the appropriateness of having a <br />plaintiff and City Council member on the proposed committee in light of the <br />pending lawsuit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.