Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 18, 2005 (Regular Meeting) <br /> <br />Page 142 <br /> <br />(E-1) Appeal by Parker Eo Orleans Homebui1ders of the Planning and Zoning <br />CODDllission's February J.7th Denial of the Wellington Chase Subdivision C05- <br />06 (S) <br /> <br />On March 21, 2005, the Board tabled the appeal by Parker & Orleans <br />Homebuilders of the Planning and Zoning Commission's denial of the Wellington <br />Chase Subdivision [C05-06(S)] on February 17. <br /> <br />Jonathan Marshall, Commerce Director, stated he was available to <br />respond to questions. There were no questions by the Board. <br /> <br />There was brief discussion regarding the Board's action on March 21, <br />including Commissioner Privette's motion to deny the project. It was <br />clarified that the substitute motion by Vice Chairman Carruth and approved by <br />the Board was to table the appeal until this date (April 18). <br /> <br />Chairman Carpenter presented the following motion: <br /> <br />Pursuant to Chapter 4, Section 17 of Cabarrus County's <br />current subdivision ordinance, the county is responsible for <br />reviewing each subdivision plat submitted to determine among <br />other things, whether public facilities, including schools, fire <br />and rescue, law enforcement and other facilities, are adequate to <br />serve new residences and new residents occasioned by development. <br />Under the Ordinance, "adequate" means adequate now, or programmed <br />to be in place within two years of preliminary approval. <br /> <br />On February 17, 2005, the Cabarrus County Planning and <br />Zoning Commission unanimously denied Petition C05-06 (S), finding <br />BOTH that insufficient school capacity currently exists to serve <br />the additional students arising from the development and <br />construction of Wellington Chase AND that the IS-year school <br />Facility Plan adopted by the Cabarrus County School System simply <br />does not include the additional school capacity reasonably <br />expected to arise from the anticipated new residents of this <br />subdivision. <br /> <br />On March 15, 2005, the developer of Wellington Chase, <br />together with the landowner (the "Applicants"), appealed the <br />denial of preliminary plat approval to this Board. The <br />Applicants agreed, and continue to agree, among other things, to <br />contribute $4,034.00 per lot to advance adequacy and to provide, <br />at their own cost, certain improvements to the intersection of <br />Odell School Road and N. C. Highway 73. <br /> <br />On December 20, 2004, this Board adopted a six-month <br />moratorium on the approval of new subdivision plats within the <br />unincorporated limits of the County and initiated a thorough <br />review of the County's planning, zoning, subdivision and <br />development ordinances. This review provides for the extensive <br />and intensive involvement of citizens, developers, planners and <br />the financial community and is intended to place the County in a <br />better position to respond to exploding growth, while integrating <br />fiscal and infrastructure discipline concurrently with <br />appropriate cost-sharing. <br /> <br />While the plat application for Wellington Chase was filed <br />before the commencement of the moratorium, this Board cannot <br />ignore the results of the adequacy review as to schools, the lack <br />of funds for school construction available beyond those approved <br />in the November bond election, the effect of other infrastructure <br />planned (or unplanned) for the area, and our desire to establish <br />a truly comprehensive plan and ordinances focused on growth <br />issues and related matters scheduled to be completed in June. <br /> <br />with these comments in mind, and with their incorporation <br />into this motion as the common consensus of this Board, if <br />approved, I move we deny the appeal of Petition C05-06(S) at this <br />time, while encouraging the Applicant to resubmit upon the <br />Board's adoption of the post moratorium standards and ordinances. <br /> <br />vice Chairman Carruth seconded the motion and commented on pressures of <br />development, conservation desires, infrastructure needs and N. C. Department <br />of Transportation reform. The motion passed unanimously. <br />