Laserfiche WebLink
537 <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Barnhart, seconded by Commissioner Payne with <br />Commissioners Barnhart, Payne and Hamby and Chairman Carpenter voting for, the <br />Board approved Petition 92-06 by Foil B. Carriker to rezone property on N.C. <br />24/27 (Midlander Restaurant), PIN 5334-68-4958, from C-4 to C-2. <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Barnhart, seconded by Commissioner Hamby with <br />Commissioners Barnhart, Hamby, and Payne and Chairman Carpenter voting for, the <br />Board set a public hearing at 7:00 P.M. on Monday, June 15, 1992, to consider <br />the naming of an Unnamed Road to Manteo Drive. <br /> Chairman Carpenter recessed the meeting of the Board at 7:25 P.M. until <br />the conclusion of the Water and Sewer District meeting. <br /> Chairman Carpenter reconvened the meeting of the Board of County <br />Commissioners at 7:54 P.M. <br /> Mr. Tom Dillard, Library Director, reviewed the proposal for the <br />establishment of a local history/genealogy room at the Charles A. Cannon <br />Memorial Library - Kannapolis Branch. The room would be created by the erection <br />of a partition wall in the "fiction room" of the library at an approximate cost <br />of $7,000.00 to be paid by the Kannapolis History Associates. The Associates <br />will also seek to secure any necessary furnishings for the room through memorial <br />gifts and donations. Also, volunteers will be used to staff the room. <br /> UPON MOTION of Commissioner Barnhart, seconded by Commissioner Hamby with <br />Commissioners Barnhart, Hamby, and Payne and Chairman Carpenter voting for, the <br />Board approved the proposal for the establishment of a local history/genealogy <br />room at the Charles A. Cannon Memorial Library - Kannapolis Branch as presented <br />by Mr. Tom Dillard, Library Director. Kannapolis History Associates will <br />provide the funds up to $7,000.00 for the construction of the wall and seek to <br />provide furnishings through memorial gifts and donations. <br /> Commissioner Barnhart stated opposition to the proposed revisions to the <br />Pay Plan as submitted by Mr. Don Moorhead, Personnel Officer. He stated in his <br />opinion an average 7 to 7 1/2 percent pay increase for an employee is <br />unacceptable. Also, he objected to an "exceptional" rating for such a high <br />percentage of employees. Commissioner Barnhart expressed concern that the pay <br />increases.had been on hold since January 1 and asked for an additional financial <br />analysis of the Pay Plan. He made a motion which was seconded by Commissioner <br />Hamby to table consideration of the proposed revisions until after the budget <br />sessions. <br /> In response to Commissioner Barnhart's concerns, Mr. Witherspoon pointed <br />out the following aspects of the proposed revisions to the Pay Plan: (1) <br />Provides greater flexibility in awarding employees by creating 1/2 percent <br />steps; (2) Uses a budgeted amount allocated each year by the Board for salary <br />increases; (3) Creates greater control of costs by making individual non- <br />recurring lump sum payments to employees with the base rate to be changed only <br />after an employee receives a merit increase for three consecutive years; (4) <br />Improves the training and job development areas of the Plan; and (5) Provides <br />greater opportunity for employees in the upper part of the salary grade to <br />receive pay increases. In conclusion, he reported that department heads had <br />decided in January to hold all pay increases until the Pay Plan revisions were <br />completed and submitted to the Board. <br /> It was noted during discussion that a letter had been received from <br />Commissioner Simmons expressing his opposition to the proposed Pay Plan <br />revisions and asking that the matter be tabled until after completion of the <br />Fiscal Year 1992-93 budget. In his letter, Commissioner Simmons cited concerns <br />regarding the size of the pay raises, the expense to the County, the number of <br />employees eligible for top increases, and the rating of a large number of <br />employees as "exceptional" <br /> Mr. Moorhead asked for an opportunity to meet with Commissioner Barnhart <br />to review the proposed revisions to the Pay Plan and to answer any questions he <br />may have regarding the Plan. All other members of the Board had previously met <br />with Mr. Moorhead to discuss these revisions. <br /> UPON MOTION of Chairman Carpenter, seconded by Commissioner Hamby with <br />Chairman Carpenter and Commissioners Hamby and Barnhart voting for and <br />Commissioner Payne voting against, the Board tabled the proposed Pay Plan <br />revisions until the next meeting and asked that Commissioners Barnhart and <br />Simmons meet with Mr. Witherspoon and Mr. Moorhead to discuss the proposed <br />revisions prior to that meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />