My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 12, 2022 PZ Agenda
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
Planning
>
2020
>
July 12, 2022 PZ Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2022 10:47:58 AM
Creation date
7/8/2022 10:45:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
7/12/2022
Board
Parks
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planningand Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />June 14, 2022 <br />We have stated that therewill be encroachment intothe buffer, not reduction of buffer on <br />landscaping. Wehave also stated that the pool deck and the splash pad deck would encroach <br />very minimal. There is no other way to work around it. <br />The Chair asked if there were any discussionon Item #2. We need tovote on landscape buffer <br />relief requirement. The parking and buffer encroachmentsalong with the walking trail <br />encroachments.He asked if there were a motion. <br />Mr. Corley said will make a motion and he will read just for clarity. He knows that it has come <br />up that we are allowing encroachments and not reduction in the buffer. <br />Mr. Jeff Corley MOTIONED, SECONDEDbyMr. Charles Paxton to APPROVEthe request <br />for relief from the perimeter landscape buffer with requirements to allow encroachments into the <br />perimeter landscape buffer as outlined in the Staff report and shown on the site plan and toallow <br />parking lot landscape buffer encroachments as discussed in the Staff report and shown on the site <br />plan.The vote was unanimous. <br />Mr. Kochsaid the document that was handed out by Mr. Murray, that the Board received a copy <br />ofhad a bunch of findings of fact that he was giving youthat he thought was based on the <br />evidence. He asked if anyone have any problemwith any of thosethat was listed in there? You <br />kind of covered a lot of them in your discussion and in yourvote. Since they are laid out in that <br />order he wanted to see if there were any members of the Commission that found that they were <br />not accurateorsupported by your decision. <br />The Chair asked everyone to glance over those to make sure there were no issues. There were no <br />comments about the document submitted by Mr. Murray. <br />Mr. David Goldberg reminded the Boardto look atthe conditions that are beingrecommended <br />by Staffand if you wanted those included as well. <br />The Chair asked if there was a motion to approve the conditions recommended by staffin the <br />report. The Chair read the followingconditions recommended by Staff. <br />The Granting Order, stating restrictions and applicable conditions of approval, shall be <br />recorded with the deed of the property. <br />The applicant shall submit a site plan, along with the subsequent rezoning request, that is <br />in compliance with the findings/conclusions of thisvariance request. <br />Approved variances must be reflected on site plan submittals moving forward.Any <br />changes thereto would require review and approval from the Board of Adjustment. <br />26 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.